The debate over debates continues between the Stabenow and Hoekstra campaigns
This week we saw the debate showdown between President Obama and former Governor Mitt Romney. Political pundits are talking non-stop about how Romney pulled off a campaign reversal. Debates can be game changers. And, then, there are the Michigan debates, or lack thereof. We have a statewide race that pits incumbent Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow against former Republican Congressman Pete Hoekstra. They’ve both agreed to debates. They just haven’t agreed to the same debates.
It’s a debate… about debates
Hoekstra has the most to gain by debating. It’s why he’s pushing for more than just the two that he and Stabenow have agreed upon – at least in concept. One of those two debates, to take place at the Detroit Economic Club, isn’t really a debate but more of a joint appearance. As the incumbent with what appears to be a very comfortable lead, Stabenow has the most to lose. Certainly we saw an example of that Wednesday night: the perils of a debate to a front-runner. So, it raises the question, if Stabenow has very little to gain from a Senatorial debate, why hasn’t Hoekstra agreed to dates for the two appearances both campaigns have accepted. Holding out certainly hasn’t seemed to help the Hoekstra campaign.
If you’re the Hoekstra campaign and you can’t get your opponent to debate and you’re looking for something that changes the conversation, pulls you out of a rut, what better than to take a few days to travel… to the Middle East; Israel to be exact. This past weekend Hoekstra flew to Tel Aviv in an effort to turn the conversation to a topic where he is taken seriously: foreign policy. When Hoekstra was in Congress he chaired the House Intelligence Committee and had a security clearance.
However, when Hoekstra returned from the trip and was asked about the officials with whom he met, he said he couldn’t say. He says this was because the trip was not State Department-approved and in order to get officials in Israel to speak with him, he had to promise them their anonymity.
Why not just make ‘em debate?
At the national level, there’s the Presidential Debate commission. It’s a not-for-profit corporation run jointly by the Democratic and Republican parties. It sets a debate schedule and the candidates show up. There are also states, like Indiana, that have independent debate commissions. Michigan could do something like that - create must-show debates for candidates - but it’s never happened because TV stations would rather compete with each other to try and win their exclusive debate than cooperate in a joint venture. So, these days, one candidate can stone-wall the whole thing. That’s why last year, we had just one gubernatorial debate and in some years in statewide races, Michigan has had no debates at all.
And, for us political junkies, that is just no fun at all.