Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This mom didn't know why her family was sick until she checked their water
- This Michigan-bred musician nails 29 celebrity impressions in one song
- Here's how to test and treat your drinking water well for arsenic
- The polarizing reactions to the 'Hobby Lobby' case are more frightening than the Cold War
- Charter school supporters’ response to investigations is "Soviet" in style
Wed April 3, 2013
Federal judge rules against Blue Cross in autism lawsuit
A federal judge has ruled that Blue Cross must pay hundreds of Michigan families who were denied coverage for behavioral therapy for children with autism.
Blue Cross contends the therapy is experimental, but doctors disagree.
The ruling may cost Blue Cross about five million dollars.
Attorney Gerald Mantese represented the hundreds of Michigan families that sued Blue Cross. He says the judge found Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan’s “characterization of Applied Behavioral Analysis Therapy as ‘experimental’ was totally arbitrary…and contrary to the medical evidence.”
Mantese is also an attorney in a similar lawsuit in Philadelphia against Cigna insurance. Thousands of autism patients are involved in that lawsuit.
“This ruling will help us fight against (Cigna),” says Mantese.
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan may appeal the federal judge’s ruling.