Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- What explains Michigan's large Arab American community?
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
- Michigan's campaign for governor gets weird as Republicans deploy spyglasses
Wed January 9, 2013
Michigan Court of Appeals upholds benefits for live-in partners of state employees
A divided Michigan Court of Appeals has upheld extending health benefits to the live-in partners of state employees.
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette challenged the state Civil Service Commission agreement with public employee unions.
Among other things, the attorney general says the policy violates Michigan’s constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and civil unions.
But the court’s majority said the policy makes no distinction between people in same-sex relationships and heterosexual live-in partners.
Nevertheless, Emily Dievendorf of Equality Michigan said the decision is a victory for gay rights.
“We know that at this point in our country’s history, the majority of Americans and now the majority of Michigan voters and Michigan residents are on the right side of history when it comes to gay rights,” she said.
129 couples and their families are covered by state live-in partner benefits.
The attorney general could appeal the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
A divided panel of the Michigan Court of Appeals has upheld extending health benefits to the live-in partners of state employees.
The court majority said the policy does not violate Michigan's ban on same-sex marriage and civil unions because it treats same-sex and heterosexual live-in partners the same way.
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette could appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court.