Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- These three female candidates could be some of the most interesting leaders in Michigan
- Those who want to outlaw publications over sexually explicit ads should study Constitution first
Mon June 24, 2013
Supreme Court to hear case which directly affects Panera Bread workers in Michigan
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments in a dispute between President Obama and congressional Republicans which is directly affecting the lives of Michigan workers.
At issue is the president’s authority to make "recess" appointments.
Recess appointments are made when the president fills a governmental position while the Congress is in recess.
In this case, President Obama filled three vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board without getting his appointees confirmed by Congress.
The Constitution gives the president the power to make temporary appointments to fill positions that otherwise require confirmation by the Senate, but only when the Senate is in recess.
A federal judge has ruled that the appointments to the NLRB violated the U.S. Constitution.
The judge has put the NLRB’s decisions dating back to 2012 on hold until the matter is resolved.
The Michigan connection
In 2012, a group of 18 bakers voted to form a union at six Panera Bread locations along I-94 in West and mid-Michigan.
The NLRB certified the vote, but the local franchisee appealed the NLRB decision.
That union certification vote is now tied up with the case that will go before the U.S. Supreme Court.
A spokesman for the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco and Grain Millers International Union accuses companies of using the dispute to “bust the union” organizing efforts in Michigan and elsewhere.
A local Panera bread spokesman denies the allegation.
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case either later this year, or early in 2014. A decision is not expected until around a year from now.