Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- What explains Michigan's large Arab American community?
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
- Michigan's campaign for governor gets weird as Republicans deploy spyglasses
Politics & Government
Wed May 22, 2013
Warren's mayor unimpressed by "window dressing" changes to fireworks law
It could be a long, hot, NOISY summer in Warren, Michigan, along with many other communities.
The city's mayor, Jim Fouts, is one of the most vocal critics of the state's one-year-old fireworks law, which permits individuals to purchase commercial-grade fireworks, and set them off the day before, the day of, and the day after ten major holidays.
He says a modification to the law being considered by the state legislature will do no good.
Legislators say they plan to allow cities to ban the discharge of fireworks between midnight and 8 a.m. on the legal fireworks days.
But Fouts says people already openly flout the current restrictions, by setting off fireworks almost all summer long, whenever they feel like it - and they will almost certainly ignore an after-midnight ban as well.
"Basically it's a fireworks frenzy, that is unceasing," says Fouts.
Fouts says people from as far away as Mackinac Island have called his office to thank him for taking a stand against the law.
"So I feel like I've been a voice for the many thousands of people - maybe more than that - who've been very frustrated with this situation," he says.
Proponents of the legislation last year said the easing of fireworks restrictions could bring $40 million dollars into state coffers in vendor licensing fees.
But it hasn't turned into the cash cow they were hoping. Last year the state collected only about $3 million in fees.