Michigan voters rejected Proposal 3 on Tuesday. The proposal would’ve required utilities to get 25 percent of their electricity sales from renewable sources by the year 2025. It was controversial partly because it would’ve amended the state constitution.
Howard Edelson is the campaign manager for CARE for Michigan. The group worked to defeat the proposal on behalf of the state’s utilities.
Proposal 3 would amend the state constitution and require utilities to get 25 percent of their electricity sales from renewable sources by the year 2025.
You may start noticing more solar arrays on land and tops of buildings, if Proposal 3 passes.
Take, for example, the American Waste garbage and recycling center near Traverse City, where two electricians were finishing up installation of a solar array on the property when I visited.
In Michigan, we get more than half of our electricity from coal and all of that coal is imported from other states.
Soon, you’ll be asked whether you want more of our electricity to come from sources like the wind and the sun.
Proposal 3 will ask voters to amend the state Constitution to require utilities to get 25 percent of their electricity sales from renewable sources (the proposal defines these sources as wind, solar, biomass and hydropower) by the year 2025.
I suspect some people are having a harder time deciding how to vote on the renewable energy amendment -- Proposal 3 -- than on any of the other five proposals on this year’s ballot.
The others are pretty straightforward. Either you think the emergency manager law is necessary, or you don’t. Either you think collective bargaining should be a constitutional right, or you don’t.