Proposal 2 en Federal appeals court strikes down Michigan affirmative action ban <p><strong>Update 4:03 p.m.</strong></p><p>A full panel of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals <a href="">ruled that Michigan's constitutional ban on affirmative action does not hold up under the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause</a> (14th amendment).</p><p>Last year's Sixth Circuit ruling was 2-1. An appeal was made to a full panel of judges.</p><p>Today's ruling striking the ban down was 8-7.</p> Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:03:46 +0000 The Associated Press & Mark Brush 9940 at Federal appeals court strikes down Michigan affirmative action ban Stateside: Financial transparency in politics <p>Millions of dollars were invested in Michigan’s recent ballot proposals.</p><p>While citizens were aware that money was being spent, it was often unclear how much money was spent and from whom it was coming.</p><p>Michigan Radio’s Lester Graham and Rich Robinson, director of the <a href="">Michigan Campaign Finance Network</a>, spoke with Cyndy about the need for financial transparency in elections.</p> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:46:31 +0000 Michigan Radio Newsroom 9819 at Stateside: Financial transparency in politics Collective bargaining rights could be enshrined in Michigan's Constitution <p>Voters in Michigan could make some big changes to the Michigan Constitution on November 6th. They’ll decide on five proposed amendments to Michigan’s guiding legal document.</p><p>Proposal 2 would enshrine collective bargaining rights in the state Constitution.</p><p>Those supporting Proposal 2 say they’re just trying to protect workers’ rights. Labor unions around the Midwest have been feeling squeezed. The legislature in Wisconsin stripped public sector workers of their collective bargaining rights.</p> Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:00:00 +0000 Mark Brush 9714 at Collective bargaining rights could be enshrined in Michigan's Constitution Stakes are high in Michigan's Proposal 2 campaign <p>Michigan's Proposal 2 ballot campaign is being watched across the country. The proposal seeks to enshrine collective bargaining rights for public and private employees into the Michigan Constitution.</p><p>Steven Greenhouse wrote about the implications of Michigan's Proposal 2 in a recent <a href=";_r=0">New York Times</a> piece.</p> Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:28:23 +0000 Mark Brush 9651 at Stakes are high in Michigan's Proposal 2 campaign In this morning's Michigan news headlines. . . <p></p><p></p><p><strong>Snyder says Prop 2 is not a referendum on right-to-work laws</strong></p><p>"Governor Rick Snyder says if voters reject Proposal 2, that would not be an invitation to pass a right-to-work law in Michigan. Proposal 2 would guarantee collective bargaining rights in the state constitution, and call into question many of the state’s labor laws. Governor Snyder is urging a “no” vote on the proposal, but he has also asked the Legislature to stay away from right-to-work because it’s so controversial. Right-to-work laws forbid compulsory union membership as a condition of employment," Rick Pluta <a href="">reports. </a></p><p><strong>Political signs can now be displayed in bars</strong></p><p>"Michigan bars and restaurants that serve alcohol can now add political signs to their décor. Since 1954 the Michigan Liquor Control Commission has had a rule that businesses with state liquor licenses could not post signs endorsing political candidates. Last week an Ann Arbor bar along with the ACLU filed suit challenging the ban," Steve Carmody <a href="">reports. </a></p><p><strong>Voting rights group will be on call on Election Day</strong></p><p>"The Michigan Center for Election Law says it will be on call on Election Day. Volunteers will staff a hotline that voters can call if they experience problems casting a ballot. The phone number will be on yard signs outside most precincts. A member of the group says during the primary, some people called the hotline because clerks told them they couldn't vote without I.D. State law allows people to vote without I.D. if they fill out an affidavit," Tracy Samilton <a href="">reports. </a></p><p> Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:44:08 +0000 Emily Fox 9615 at In this morning's Michigan news headlines. . . Snyder: Proposal 2 is not a referendum on right-to-work laws <p>Governor Rick Snyder says Proposal 2 should not be viewed as a referendum on whether Michigan becomes a right-to-work state that outlaws compulsory union membership.</p><p>Proposal 2 would guarantee collective bargaining rights in the state constitution.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>Governor Snyder opposes Proposal 2. He says it not only guarantees collective bargaining, but would be a sweeping re-write of labor laws as they deal with public employees.</p><p>“Proposal 2 could be devastating, in my view, of what it could do to the economic recovery in Michigan, but people need to make their own assessment of how to vote,” he said.</p><p>But he said rejecting the proposal would not convince him Michigan is ready to become a right-to-work state.&nbsp;</p><p>“I don’t view it as just a green light to go ahead,” he said.</p><p>The governor has asked the Legislature to stay away from the right-to-work debate because it’s too divisive. But he has not said what he would do if the Legislature sent a bill to his desk.</p><p>One of the leading proponents of right to work in the Legislature says he won’t push the issue until he has the governor’s support.</p><p> Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:16:00 +0000 Rick Pluta 9613 at Snyder: Proposal 2 is not a referendum on right-to-work laws Political Roundup: Collective bargaining, Proposals 2 & 4 <p>Michigan voters face six questions on November’s ballot. And those questions can be very confusing. Today, we look at two proposals that focus on collective bargaining. <a href="">Proposal 2</a> would protect collective bargaining in the state constitution, and <a href="">Proposal 4</a> would reinstate collective bargaining for in-home health care workers. Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:53:52 +0000 Mercedes Mejia & Jennifer White 9529 at Political Roundup: Collective bargaining, Proposals 2 & 4 Commentary: Shame of the UAW <p>As you probably know, a Titanic battle has been going on for years now over whether to build a new bridge over the Detroit River.</p><p>On one side is Governor Rick Snyder, the government of Canada, Ford, Chrysler and General Motors, and the chambers of commerce. On the other side, Matty Moroun’s family, the owners of the Ambassador Bridge, who right now have a monopoly on moving billions in heavy automotive components from Detroit to Ontario.</p><p>The Moroun family, that is, together with those who support their position because of their money.</p> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:02:12 +0000 Jack Lessenberry 9484 at Commentary: Shame of the UAW 6 things to know about Proposal 2; Collective bargaining <p>Michigan voters are faced with a choice:</p><p><em>Should the right to collective bargaining for all Michigan workers be enshrined in the Michigan Constitution?</em></p><p>The amendment would affect the rights of <em>workers in private companies</em> and <em>workers in the public sector</em>.</p><p>If you work for a private company, the right to collectively bargain is upheld by federal law (the&nbsp;<a href="">National Labor Relations Act</a>). But the NLRA does not cover government workers.</p> Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:49:48 +0000 Mark Brush 9335 at 6 things to know about Proposal 2; Collective bargaining CRC to offer webinar on 3 ballot proposals today at 2pm <p><font face="Arial" size="3">The non-partisan, independent Citizens Research Council has been busy analyzing the <a href="">six ballot proposals</a> facing Michigan voters.</font></p><p><font face="Arial" size="3">Today at 2 p.m., they're holding an online "webinar" to discuss</font> proposals 1, 2, and 4.</p><ul><li><a href="">Proposal 1: The emergency manager law</a></li><li><a href="">Proposal 2: Collective bargaining</a></li><li><a href="">Proposal 4: Home health care worker collective bargaining &amp; registry</a></li></ul><p>From the CRC:</p><blockquote><p>CRC will offer summaries of its analyses of the referendum on Public Act 4 of 2011, the proposed constitutional amendments to enshrine the right to collective bargaining in the constitution, and the proposed constitutional amendment to establish the Michigan Quality Home Care Council and provide limited collective bargaining rights to home health care workers.</p></blockquote><p>To take part in the webinar, you can follow this <a href="">link</a>. Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:53:36 +0000 Mark Brush 9414 at CRC to offer webinar on 3 ballot proposals today at 2pm Truth Squad on Prop 2: Fouls for everyone <p>Five proposed amendments to the state Constitution and one other referendum will appear on the ballot on election day. We’ll see a lot of political commercials in the final weeks before we go to the polls. <a href="">Michigan Watch</a> is teaming up with the <a href="">Center for Michigan’s Truth Squad</a> to look at some of those ads.</p> Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:00:00 +0000 Lester Graham 9275 at Truth Squad on Prop 2: Fouls for everyone Commentary: Collective bargaining <p>There are five proposed constitutional amendments on the state ballot this fall, and at this point, it is impossible to predict whether any of them will pass or fail.</p><p>But I do think I know which will provoke the most spending: Proposal Two, the amendment that would make collective bargaining a state constitutional right. Unions are going to spend millions to try to get it passed. Chambers of commerce and corporate interests are likely to spend even more to try to make sure it fails. This is seen to some extent as a Battle of Stalingrad for the union movement.</p> Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:19:16 +0000 Jack Lessenberry 9243 at Commentary: Collective bargaining Michigan's 'Prop 2' going before a federal court on Wednesday <p>The U.S. Circuit Court in Cincinnati will hear arguments tomorrow&nbsp;about&nbsp;Michigan&#39;s&nbsp;constitutional&nbsp;amendment barring&nbsp;state&nbsp;universities from considering an applicant&rsquo;s race in college admissions.</p><p>Michigan voters overwhelmingly approved &lsquo;<a href="">proposition 2&rsquo;</a> in 2006. The amendment bars state colleges and other publicly funded institutions from considering an applicant&rsquo;s minority status.</p><p>Mark Rosenbaum is with the American Civil Liberties Union. He says Prop 2 violates the U.S. Constitution by forbidding the consideration of race, while other factors like whether a college applicant&rsquo;s parent is an alumnus, are&nbsp;still permitted.</p><p>&ldquo;That&rsquo;s un-American because it removes &lsquo;racial identity&rsquo; from the vocabulary of a democracy,&quot; says Rosenbaum.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>Last year, a federal appellate court ruled against Prop 2.&nbsp; Joy Yearout is with the Michigan Attorney General&rsquo;s office.&nbsp; She says&nbsp;the&nbsp;Attorney General finds a serious problem with that ruling.</p><p>&ldquo;The U.S. Court of Appeals said that by banning racial discrimination it somehow perpetuates discrimination,&quot; says&nbsp;Yearout, &quot;And if that sounds crazy to you, there&rsquo;s a reason.&nbsp; It just doesn&rsquo;t make any sense.&rdquo;</p><p>The case may eventually end up before the U.S. Supreme Court. Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:44:36 +0000 Steve Carmody 6525 at Court strikes down Michigan's ban on using race or gender in college admissions <p><strong>Update 3:00 p.m.</strong></p><p><span style="font-size:11.0pt">The <a href="">Michigan Department of Civil Rights</a> released a statement supporting the opinion of the US 6<sup><span>th </span></sup>Circuit Court of Appeals. The court struck down the Michigan constitutional ban using race or gender in university admissions decisions.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:11.0pt">From their statement: </span></p><blockquote><p><span style="font-size:11.0pt">We believe the question of who comprises a student body is best made at the academic rather than the political level. A university&rsquo;s primary responsibility is the academic interests of those students who are admitted and preparing those students for the future. This decision removes the handcuffs that prevented Michigan&rsquo;s public universities from making decisions based upon those factors they believed to be in the best interests of the entire student body and the institutions as a whole.</span></p></blockquote><p>The <a href="">Michigan Roundtable for Diversity and Inclusion</a>, an advocacy group that worked to preserve affirmative action in Michigan, also praised today&#39;s court ruling.</p><p>From their statement:</p><blockquote><p>The Michigan Roundtable for Diversity and Inclusion today applauded the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision striking down Michigan&#39;s anti-affirmative action constitutional amendment, with CEO and President Thomas Costello calling the decision &quot;a clear win for access, opportunity and equity for all.&quot;</p><p>The court noted that the 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, known as the &quot;equal protection&quot; clause, is more than just words. &quot;It is also an assurance that the majority may not manipulate the channels of change in a manner that places unique burdens on issues of importance to racial minorities.&quot;</p></blockquote><p><strong>2:30 p.m.</strong></p><p>Michigan Radio&#39;s Steve Carmody interviewed Jennifer Gratz, the director of state initiatives for the <a href="">American Civil Rights Coalition</a>.</p><p>In 2006, Gratz was the executive director of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative which became known as &quot;Proposal 2&quot; once it was put on the ballot. Proposal 2 passed and it amended the Michigan Constitution by banning the practice of using race or gender in college admissions.</p><p>The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the ban unconstitutional today.</p><p>Gratz was also a lead plaintiff in a case against the University of Michigan&#39;s affirmative action policy in admissions - a case that went all the way to the Supreme Court in 2003 (Gratz v. Bollinger).</p><p>Here&#39;s the interview:</p><p> Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:00:57 +0000 Mark Brush 3117 at Court strikes down Michigan's ban on using race or gender in college admissions