Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- These three female candidates could be some of the most interesting leaders in Michigan
- Those who want to outlaw publications over sexually explicit ads should study Constitution first
Mon September 20, 2010
Breaking down the attack ads with Truth Squad
Here's an interesting post from FactCheck.org, "candidates have a legal right to lie to voters." It's protected speech. In fact, TV or radio stations running political ads they know to be false, can't refuse to run the ad.
Recently, they talked about some of the ads we're seeing in the governor's race.
It's all about jobs this year, and each candidate seems eager to paint the other as a "jobs killer." Here's an example of ad from the Michigan Democratic Party attacking Rick Snyder's record on jobs:
Bebow says this ad was rated a "foul" by the Truth Squad for misrepresenting Snyder's record at Gateway.
A Michigan Republican Party ad attacking Virg Bernero's record on jobs in Lansing was also rated a "foul."
One of the things that seems amazing to a lot of voters is, I thought if these ads got on TV somebody had somehow vetted them. You can't put something on TV that's not true.
says Graham. It might seem that way, but there's no "truth in advertising" for political ads. Do you think there should be?