Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Proposal 1 asks Michigan voters to weigh in on a complex tax issue
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- These three female candidates could be some of the most interesting leaders in Michigan
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
Politics & Government
Thu October 4, 2012
Bridge owners say analysis shows new bridge not economically feasible
A report commissioned by the owners of the Ambassador Bridge says Gov. Rick Snyder has not given voters enough information about the economic impact of a proposed new span over the Detroit River.
The analysis by a Grand Rapids consulting firm says plans for the new bridge are not economically feasible.
"A CEO in the private sector making a multi-billion-dollar investment with concerns about the bottom line in shareholder return would put this proposal under a lot more scrutiny than it appears the governor has," says Patrick O'Keefe, CEO of O'Keefe and Associates.
O'Keefe says a new bridge would harm existing crossings from Michigan to Canada, including the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel and the Blue Water Bridge near Port Huron. He also says the new bridge would cost the state about $325 million in lost taxes over 20 years.
The plan is for Canada to pay for the construction of the bridge, which would be repaid by tolls.
A proposal on next month's ballot would require a statewide vote before Michigan could take part in building a new international bridge.
O'Keefe called his company's analysis independent because they were paid by the owners of the Ambassador Bridge before the study was done.