OpinionMore 'dark money' will influence politics in Michigan if Snyder doesn't veto
The Environment ReportGo lake trout! Native fish overcome seemingly ‘insurmountable’ challenges in Lake Huron
Politics & GovernmentIn his farewell speech Bing says, 'I will remain involved in Detroit's transformation'
Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Former Detroit broadcaster was inspiration for 'Ron Burgundy'
- Muskegon is home to America's tallest, singing Christmas tree
- Pressure builds on Michigan Football as Athletic Department's budget grows
- Why this 20 year old is getting a mastectomy, and why she's not alone
- Michigan Republican party fails to address Dave Agema's bigotry and hatred
Politics & Government
Thu October 4, 2012
Bridge owners say analysis shows new bridge not economically feasible
A report commissioned by the owners of the Ambassador Bridge says Gov. Rick Snyder has not given voters enough information about the economic impact of a proposed new span over the Detroit River.
The analysis by a Grand Rapids consulting firm says plans for the new bridge are not economically feasible.
"A CEO in the private sector making a multi-billion-dollar investment with concerns about the bottom line in shareholder return would put this proposal under a lot more scrutiny than it appears the governor has," says Patrick O'Keefe, CEO of O'Keefe and Associates.
O'Keefe says a new bridge would harm existing crossings from Michigan to Canada, including the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel and the Blue Water Bridge near Port Huron. He also says the new bridge would cost the state about $325 million in lost taxes over 20 years.
The plan is for Canada to pay for the construction of the bridge, which would be repaid by tolls.
A proposal on next month's ballot would require a statewide vote before Michigan could take part in building a new international bridge.
O'Keefe called his company's analysis independent because they were paid by the owners of the Ambassador Bridge before the study was done.