Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- No, Chinese investors aren't 'buying up Detroit' – but they do have an eye on the Motor City
- The average Michigan family needs $52,330 a year to 'make ends meet'
- If Arizona's bill to discriminate surprises you, you won't believe what's legal in Michigan
- What all the snow and ice will mean for Great Lakes water levels
- Here are our 10 favorite photos of what your winter looks like
Tue February 4, 2014
Can we get the best medical treatment while controlling health care costs?
What's your reaction when the conversation turns to America's soaring health care costs – when you hear that by 2020, just six years from now, our health care spending will hit $4.5 trillion?
Maybe it's all too big, too "macro" for us to absorb on a personal level.
So try this: Should your 92-year-old grandmother undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery –surgery that costs upwards of $20,000?
What about a girl who's 17 years old? Her leukemia treatments aren't working. Her liver is failing, other organs are failing, she is near death and her family is demanding a liver transplant, which the surgeon proposed, but the HMO refuses to authorize?
These are real-life dilemmas facing doctors, patients, and us.
We want everything modern medicine can offer, but as taxpayers we want health care costs controlled.
Can we achieve both goals?
Leonard Fleck, a professor of philosophy and a medical ethicist from Michigan State University, joined us today.
Listen to the full interview above.