Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- "A sad day" for Michigan bats: White-nose syndrome found in 3 counties
- This is doing more damage to Detroit than a hundred drug murders could have
- Biologists expect the worst for Michigan's bat population
- Power shift at Kendall College causing a stir
- This is what it sounds like when a neighborhood church closes
Thu July 26, 2012
Commentary: Hijacking our constitution
If what I am about to tell you doesn’t make you angry and indignant, then you must be completely cynical.
Huge corporations and other special interests have already spent $20 million on ballot drives designed to bend the Michigan Constitution to suit their selfish needs.
They have spent $20 million; they’ve raised almost $30 million, and every sign indicates they’re just getting started.
These numbers, by the way, come from the non-profit, non-partisan Michigan Campaign Finance Network.
Rich Studley, who heads the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, put it this way, “I think there’s a growing awareness in the general public that there’s an effort underway to hijack the state constitution.”
Well, I am not sure to what extent he’s right about public awareness, but otherwise, he was dead on. Now when Studley said that, he was talking specifically about the one proposed amendment he most opposes: The one called Protect Our Jobs, which would constitutionally protect collective bargaining rights for both private sector and public sector workers.
Unions have raised $8 million to put Protect Our Jobs on the November ballot. They seem to have collected more than enough signatures, but they have yet to be certified by the Secretary of State’s office. Court challenges are possible, even likely, to all seven proposals awaiting certification.
But assuming these things do get on the ballot, you can expect that the money that’s been raised and spent so far is just the first round. Something else is bound to happen, too. We can at least trace where most of this
money came from.
However, Michigan has about the nation’ s worst system in terms of transparency and accountability, according to the Center for Public Integrity. That means anonymous, so-called “issue oriented” groups can raise and spend millions more without disclosing their donors. Such groups have already spent more than $6 million here to run down President Obama.
What strikes me as most horrifying, when I look at these campaign finance reports, is that a single man spent more than $6 million in six months in a double-barreled attempt to pervert our Constitution to enrich
himself. Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun spent nearly $2 million to try to get an initiative on the ballot that would require a two-thirds vote of the legislature to raise any taxes.
And he, or technically, his company spent $4.6 million on an effort to get a constitutional amendment to require a statewide vote to approve any new bridge over the Detroit River.
Gov. Snyder says this would have no effect on the new bridge that has been announced, but Moroun disagrees. And some think he may spend $20 million before this is through. Clearly, this is a perversion of democracy. But what can anyone do?
The U.S. Supreme Court said two years ago that essentially no limits could be put on corporate campaign spending. But there may be a way to mitigate this. What matters is advertising over the airwaves. The Federal
Communications Commission could forbid stations from accepting political ads, or put strict limits on them.
That may sound radical, but so is the complete hijacking of our state by special interests. We really need to give something a try.