Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
Politics & Government
Tue June 11, 2013
Congressman Sander Levin to live on $31 food budget for a week
It's not easy to buy enough nutritious, filling food to last a week if you only have $31 -- the average amount an individual on food stamps receives from the federal government.
"I bought tuna, lots of cans of tuna," says Michigan Congressman Sandy Levin.
Levin is participating in a challenge to eat on an impoverished person's food budget for a week, to call attention to deep cuts in food programs proposed by House Republicans.
Levin says he also bought bread, milk, cereal, green beans and peanut butter, and to make the challenge completely legitimate, he'll even avoid freebie buffets at events he attends in D.C. this week.
Republicans on the House Agriculture Committee want to cut $20 billion over the next 10 years from food programs for the poor, disabled, and children as part of efforts to reduce the federal deficit.
Levin says the deficit does need to be reduced, but with a combination of cuts and revenue increases (read, tax increases and eliminating tax credits).
He calls the House Republican proposal "an example of a cut that is too drastic (and) that is going to unduly hurt people within our communities. I met a woman just a few days ago, disabled, who is receiving this assistance, and she told me on Saturdays and Sundays most weeks she has nothing to eat but bread."
Levin says that woman, along with millions of others, could see her food assistance reduced, or eliminated entirely under the proposed $20 billion in cuts to federal food programs.
A similar proposal in the Senate reduces food program spending, but by a much smaller amount.