Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- "A sad day" for Michigan bats: White-nose syndrome found in 3 counties
- This is doing more damage to Detroit than a hundred drug murders could have
- Biologists expect the worst for Michigan's bat population
- Power shift at Kendall College causing a stir
- This is what it sounds like when a neighborhood church closes
Thu March 3, 2011
Enviros want to replace Ohio nuclear plant with wind, solar energy
A coalition of environmental groups wants to stop a nuclear power plant in Ohio from renewing its license.
The operating license for the Davis Besse Nuclear Power Plant in Ohio runs out in 2017. By that point, the plant will be 40 years old. First Energy, the company that owns the plant, wants to renew the license for another twenty years.
That’s the last thing Michael Keegan wants. He’s with the environmental group, Don’t Waste Michigan. Keegan and others went before a panel to challenge the license renewal:
"We have solar, wind and in combination we have replacement power available now which can be put in place prior to 2017."
Reporter Tom Henry with the Toledo Blade was at the proceeding and filed a story. Here's an excerpt:
The first half of the proceeding was focused on projections for wind power, solar power, and a combination of the two as possible offsets for nuclear power. The afternoon was devoted to a FirstEnergy document known as a Severe Accident Mitigation Analysis, one in which utilities are obligated to show how they would respond to dangerous nuclear scenarios.
Arguments in favor of renewables appear to rely on the viability of harnessing wind, solar, and other sources for later use through a technology known as compressed air energy storage, judges said. [Adam] Polonsky [of Washington-based Morgan Lewis Counselors at Law, which has represented FirstEnergy on nuclear issues for years] conceded it has potential and should be explored.
"But that doesn't mean it is a reasonable alternative to a 908-megawatt reactor," he said, referring to Davis-Besse's generating capacity.
The panel now has to decide whether the environmental groups can move forward with their petition to intervene.
In Michigan, the license for the Fermi II Nuclear Plant is good through 2025.
A Clean Slate for the State?