Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- What explains Michigan's large Arab American community?
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
- Signed a petition to oppose Asian carp? You actually signed a petition to allow wolf hunting
Wed April 3, 2013
Federal judge rules against Blue Cross in autism lawsuit
A federal judge has ruled that Blue Cross must pay hundreds of Michigan families who were denied coverage for behavioral therapy for children with autism.
Blue Cross contends the therapy is experimental, but doctors disagree.
The ruling may cost Blue Cross about five million dollars.
Attorney Gerald Mantese represented the hundreds of Michigan families that sued Blue Cross. He says the judge found Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan’s “characterization of Applied Behavioral Analysis Therapy as ‘experimental’ was totally arbitrary…and contrary to the medical evidence.”
Mantese is also an attorney in a similar lawsuit in Philadelphia against Cigna insurance. Thousands of autism patients are involved in that lawsuit.
“This ruling will help us fight against (Cigna),” says Mantese.
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan may appeal the federal judge’s ruling.