Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
Politics & Government
Wed August 8, 2012
Fight over vote counting in the House reaches Michigan Court of Appeals
The fight over how the Republican majority in the Michigan House of Representatives counts votes has gone to the state Court of Appeals.
Democrats sued Republicans to require recorded votes on a procedural motion that determines when a new law will go into effect.
The motion to make a law effective immediately requires a two-thirds super-majority that Republicans don’t have in the House.
Michael Hodge is the attorney representing Democrats in the lawsuit.
"Look, the constitution has certain voting requirements in it for the Legislature to give a law immediate effect, and all we’re asking the court to do is tell them they actually have to count votes," he said.
Assistant Attorney General Heather Meingast argued for the House Republican leadership. She says courts should not meddle in how another branch of government conducts its business.
"Plaintiffs are asking this court, and courts like it, to go somewhere they’ve never before, which is to delve into the inner workers of the Legislature, to reach out and sort of control or direct what’s going to go on the floor," she said.
Meingast says that could bog down the process of lawmaking in litigation.
The House GOP lost in a lower court.