Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
Sat October 8, 2011
Justice will not remove himself from emergency manager challenge
A state Supreme Court justice is refusing to remove himself from hearing a challenge to the Michigan’s tough new local emergency manager law. Supreme Court Justice Steve Markman says he has no conflict of interest even though his wife worked on a challenge to the law in federal court.
Kathleen Markman is an assistant state attorney general who did what was described as procedural work to defend the law against the federal court challenge. She has since been removed from the case.
State Supreme Court Justice Stephen Markman says that eliminates any potential conflict – although he also says there is no reason to believe his actions on the state case would influence the federal decision or vice versa. Michigan Supreme Court justices determine on their own whether or not they have a conflict in a case. If Markman had removed himself, that would leave the court evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats hearing the challenge. Markman is a Republican.
Republican Governor Rick Snyder has asked the state Supreme Court to take up the challenge to the constitutionality of the state takeover law without waiting for lower courts to rule.
Michigan Supreme Court