OpinionMore 'dark money' will influence politics in Michigan if Snyder doesn't veto
The Environment ReportGo lake trout! Native fish overcome seemingly ‘insurmountable’ challenges in Lake Huron
Politics & GovernmentIn his farewell speech Bing says, 'I will remain involved in Detroit's transformation'
Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Former Detroit broadcaster was inspiration for 'Ron Burgundy'
- Muskegon is home to America's tallest, singing Christmas tree
- Pressure builds on Michigan Football as Athletic Department's budget grows
- Why this 20 year old is getting a mastectomy, and why she's not alone
- Michigan Republican party fails to address Dave Agema's bigotry and hatred
Tue August 14, 2012
Michigan Court of Appeals: Casino ballot initiative is 'unconstitutional'
This morning, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled a ballot initiative that would approve eight more private casinos in the state will not appear on the Nov. 6 ballot. The court ruled the ballot proposal is unconstitutional.
The groups Citizens for More Michigan Jobs and Protect MI Vote sparred over the ballot question that would allow new casinos in Detroit, Clam Lake Township, DeWitt Township, Pontiac, Clinton Township, Birch Run Township, Grand Rapids and Romulus.
In June, Citizens for More Michigan Jobs delivered petition with about 500,000 signatures in favor of putting the initiative on the ballot to the Secretary of State’s office.
But Protect MI Vote, backed in part by existing casinos, argued that initiative would bypass the Liquor Control Act and would improperly make amendments to the Gaming Control & Revenue Act, reports the Freep. They filed the lawsuit heard by the Appeals Court that sought to block the ballot question.
Today, the Court of Appeals sided with Protect MI Vote, disallowing the question from the ballot.
However, in a press release, Citizens for More Michigan Jobs Spokesman T.J. Bucholz said his group will fight the ruling.
“From Day One, we have firmly believed the law in this matter has always been on our side. We will read the Court’s opinion closely in the coming days and are planning to appeal the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.”
Politics & Government
Politics & Government