Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- What explains Michigan's large Arab American community?
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
- Michigan's campaign for governor gets weird as Republicans deploy spyglasses
Thu May 3, 2012
Michigan Court of Appeals hears cases on emergency manager law
The state Court of Appeals heard challenges today to the determinations that Flint and Detroit face financial emergencies.
The challenges say state review teams violated Michigan’s Open Meetings Act by not deliberating in public.
Attorney Andrew Paterson says the public has a right to know how a review team goes about its job.
"It is determining the financial condition of a local unit of government and it is reporting on that financial condition,” said Paterson.
Attorneys for the state say the review teams are not public bodies under the open meetings law.
The state says the teams only offer advice, and it’s ultimately up to the governor to decide whether cities and school districts are in financial emergencies.
Flint is currently being run by an emergency manager and Detroit is operating under the terms of a consent agreement with the state.
It's Just Politics