Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- No, Chinese investors aren't 'buying up Detroit' – but they do have an eye on the Motor City
- If Arizona's bill to discriminate surprises you, you won't believe what's legal in Michigan
- The average Michigan family needs $52,330 a year to 'make ends meet'
- Watch a time-lapse video of the ice forming on the Great Lakes
- What all the snow and ice will mean for Great Lakes water levels
Thu May 3, 2012
Michigan Court of Appeals hears cases on emergency manager law
The state Court of Appeals heard challenges today to the determinations that Flint and Detroit face financial emergencies.
The challenges say state review teams violated Michigan’s Open Meetings Act by not deliberating in public.
Attorney Andrew Paterson says the public has a right to know how a review team goes about its job.
"It is determining the financial condition of a local unit of government and it is reporting on that financial condition,” said Paterson.
Attorneys for the state say the review teams are not public bodies under the open meetings law.
The state says the teams only offer advice, and it’s ultimately up to the governor to decide whether cities and school districts are in financial emergencies.
Flint is currently being run by an emergency manager and Detroit is operating under the terms of a consent agreement with the state.
It's Just Politics