Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- No, Chinese investors aren't 'buying up Detroit' – but they do have an eye on the Motor City
- The average Michigan family needs $52,330 a year to 'make ends meet'
- If Arizona's bill to discriminate surprises you, you won't believe what's legal in Michigan
- What all the snow and ice will mean for Great Lakes water levels
- Here are our 10 favorite photos of what your winter looks like
Sat March 17, 2012
Michigan Supreme Court declines to weigh in on issue involving jury discussions
DETROIT (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court has turned down an appeal from a Macomb County man who claims his constitutional rights were violated when jurors were allowed to discuss evidence before the end of his trial.
The court heard arguments but recently decided not to issue a formal opinion. A state appeals court ruling upholding Maurice Richards' carjacking conviction will stand.
Richards' trial occurred when the Supreme Court was allowing some juries to talk about evidence during breaks. The pilot project ended in 2010. Attorney Christopher Smith says Richards didn't get a fair trial because his jury may have been influenced by the views of alternate jurors who were dismissed before final deliberations.
Justices Marilyn Kelly and Diane Hathaway agree that Richards didn't get a fair trial.