Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- Proposal 1 asks Michigan voters to weigh in on a complex tax issue
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- These three female candidates could be some of the most interesting leaders in Michigan
Thu November 10, 2011
Is there something missing in the latest plan to cleanup the Kalamazoo River oil spill?
A Michigan State University professor says he’s concerned a revised plan for cleaning up an oil spill in the Kalamazoo River is missing details in one important area.
Enbridge Energy has spent nearly 16 months cleaning up more than 840 thousand gallons of crude oil that spilled into the Kalamazoo River from a broken pipeline. The federal Environmental Protection Agency is reviewing Enbridge’s latest cleanup plan. The plan calls for the cleanup to continue well into next year.
Dr. Stephen Hamilton is a professor of ecosystem ecology at MSU. He's read over Enbridge's revised cleanup plan. He says the plan is 'definitely' on the right course. But Hamilton is concerned it does not include a detailed plan for toxicology tests.
“This is important because we don’t have a lot of previous experience with this kind of oil…in a fresh water body and not in a river of this kind" says Hamilton, "So we need to know what levels are toxic and harmful to life in the water and on land for that matter.”
Hamilton says it’s important to know if the oil present in the river is still toxic enough to justify the level of damage being done to the environment by the cleanup itself.
Hamilton says he would like to see a broad range of toxicology tests conducted this winter. He says doing the testing over the next few months can help guide Enbridge's cleanup plans for 2012.
An EPA spokesman says they are aware of Hamilton’s concerns, but declined to comment further.