Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- No, Chinese investors aren't 'buying up Detroit' – but they do have an eye on the Motor City
- The average Michigan family needs $52,330 a year to 'make ends meet'
- Here are our 10 favorite photos of what your winter looks like
- What all the snow and ice will mean for Great Lakes water levels
- Michigan's Attorney General is risking his political future over the gay marriage case
Mon February 28, 2011
U.S. Supreme Court rules on Michigan case
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a murder conviction in the case Michigan v. Bryant.
The case involved a Detroit man who identified his shooter as the victim lay dying, and whether or not that evidence could be considered in court.
A Wayne County jury convicted Richard Bryant of murder based on the victim's statement. But the Michigan Supreme Court overturned that conviction, saying Bryant was denied his constitutional right to confront his accuser.
Now, the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the initial conviction. The Court ruled the victim’s statement wasn’t “testimonial” in nature.
Wayne County Chief of Appeals Tim Boughman says that’s because the statement helped Detroit Police during an “ongoing emergency.” He says police were only trying to figure out what had happened, not obtain evidence against Bryant.
"You arrive on the scene, what happened? You got shot, who did it, where are they? Are they still a threat, are they right here? The Court says those things all play into whether there’s an ongoing emergency."
Baughman helped argue the case with his daughter, Lori Palmer, who served as the lead attorney.
The two are believed to be the only father-daughter legal team to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court.