Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- An MSU physicist believes he has solved the "black hole information paradox"
- What you can do to help Michigan's bats
- This is doing more damage to Detroit than a hundred drug murders could have
- Biologists expect the worst for Michigan's bat population
- Join the Great Michigan Read story-writing contest
Mon February 28, 2011
U.S. Supreme Court rules on Michigan case
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a murder conviction in the case Michigan v. Bryant.
The case involved a Detroit man who identified his shooter as the victim lay dying, and whether or not that evidence could be considered in court.
A Wayne County jury convicted Richard Bryant of murder based on the victim's statement. But the Michigan Supreme Court overturned that conviction, saying Bryant was denied his constitutional right to confront his accuser.
Now, the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the initial conviction. The Court ruled the victim’s statement wasn’t “testimonial” in nature.
Wayne County Chief of Appeals Tim Boughman says that’s because the statement helped Detroit Police during an “ongoing emergency.” He says police were only trying to figure out what had happened, not obtain evidence against Bryant.
"You arrive on the scene, what happened? You got shot, who did it, where are they? Are they still a threat, are they right here? The Court says those things all play into whether there’s an ongoing emergency."
Baughman helped argue the case with his daughter, Lori Palmer, who served as the lead attorney.
The two are believed to be the only father-daughter legal team to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court.