Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- What explains Michigan's large Arab American community?
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
- Michigan's campaign for governor gets weird as Republicans deploy spyglasses
That's What They Say
Sun October 7, 2012
Dictionary notes suggest grammar usage, acceptability
Open The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language and you will inevitably find Usage Notes under certain words. These notes warn readers there might be problems or controversies involving grammar, diction, or writing style.
Anne Curzan, a professor of English at the University of Michigan, who specializes in linguistics is 1 of 200 panelists asked to comment on the acceptability of particular usages and grammatical constructions.
“It involves writers, so Rita Dove is on it, Tobias Wolff, Margaret Atwood. There are some people who would be familiar to NPR listeners, Garrison Keillor, Frank Deford, Nina Totenberg, along with Antonin Scalia, we’re all on the panel together,” said Curzan.
About once a year the panel gets a survey asking about the acceptability of certain grammar constructions. For example, whether or not the word “irregardless” is okay.
“There is a question about which proposition should come after bored. It is bored with, bored by orbored of,” Curzan said. She found that speakers mostly use bored with and bored by, and only sometimes use bored of.
“So what I’m being asked to do is say okay what point does usage govern correctness.” And she adds:
“It’s not that we on the panel are right, but we are giving you a sense of how the language might get judged when you use it.”