Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
Wed March 12, 2014
Explaining the DIA's 'grand bargain' – and what it means for the museum
Ninety-five years ago, the Detroit Institute of Arts was in deep, deep financial trouble.
It kept the doors open by turning over the building and its art to the thriving city of Detroit in exchange for annual funding.
And now it stands, poised to flip that arrangement upside down, hoping to cut Detroit's ownership of the DIA in order to protect its treasures from hungry creditors.
There's quite a long and complicated history between the DIA and the city.
And yet, despite nearly a century tied together, the reaction of Detroiters to the proposed spin-off of the DIA is pretty muted – certainly much different than the reaction when the state took over operations of Belle Isle.
Detroit Free Press writer Mark Stryker explored this in his piece for last Sunday's paper.
Listen to the full interview above.
It's Just Politics
Arts & Culture