Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- What explains Michigan's large Arab American community?
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
- Signed a petition to oppose Asian carp? You actually signed a petition to allow wolf hunting
Thu March 27, 2014
Here's a short list of the 8 Detroit creditors who will win and lose the most
Long before Detroit Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr rolled out his proposal in February for paying back the city’s creditors, bankruptcy experts knew the pain would not be spread evenly.
Because so much of the city’s debt – nearly $6 billion owed to pay back loans for the city’s sprawling water and sewer department – cannot be reduced in bankruptcy court, the creditors feeling the brunt of the cuts are retirees and city employees.
Orr hopes that his proposed cuts to creditors – if approved by the bankruptcy judge– will allow the city to spend $1.5 billion over 10 years for more cops, more street lights and the removal of tens of thousands of blighted buildings. That would be a big win for Orr, and for Gov. Rick Snyder, who appointed Orr and pushed for bankruptcy despite fierce criticism.
Though the final score won’t be known for years, here’s a summary of other likely winners, and losers, when the terms of Detroit’s debt payments are finally approved.
The list of winners might be smaller than the losers, but it includes those who bankruptcy was designed to help – the city’s nearly 700,000 residents. The population has been in decline for decades as thousands leave every year, complaining about the poor schools, high crime and deplorable living conditions they leave behind.
If Orr’s plan is implemented and the necessary fixes are adopted, it will mean more cops on the street. It will also mean better lighting, fewer potholes and a reduction in blight on those streets. But that’s if the plan is adopted and the money is allocated.
Should bankruptcy help stabilize the city’s budget and improve its ability to deliver services, it could have a profound effect on the man currently sitting in the mayor’s office. Though Duggan said he opposed bankruptcy when he was a candidate, Orr’s appointment and the bankruptcy filing itself have eliminated some of the politically difficult decisions that would have otherwise landed on the mayor’s desk: Making wholesale budget cuts and rewriting union contracts for city workers and retirees.
Duggan could benefit most if the plan goes through and Orr’s pledge to spend $150 million a year on improvements to basic city services comes to fruition. The mayor has already pledged to make sweeping changes in his first six months in office and those efforts could get a boost from Orr, who is working closely with the Democrat.
It might not make other creditors happy, but one chunk of city bondholders will be the most certain of winners. The city has promised to pay back billions in municipal bonds, debt owed to some of the nation’s largest banks and mutual funds. A huge portion of that debt, for the city’s water and sewer department, is protected by bankruptcy law and Orr has said he’ll pay 100 percent of the principal on those bonds, covering $5.7 billion in city debt.
Yes, they’re on both lists. Why? Because Orr has infuriated the bond market by identifying more than $538 million in bonds as unsecured – or not backed by the city’s tax revenues – and offered to pay just 20 cents on every dollar owed. (If Orr’s position is upheld, it could unsettle the broader municipal bond market, which has always operated on the assumption that these debts will be fully paid. This in turn could lead to higher borrowing costs for municipalities as risk rises.) Bonds issued for the Downtown Development Authority, which has $33.6 million in city debt, are also tabbed to get 20 cents on the dollar under Orr’s repayment proposal.
The biggest unknown is what will happen to an estimated $1.4 billion the city borrowed in 2005 and 2006 to shore up the city’s pension funds for city workers. Orr claims the “certificates of participation” (or COP) loans were made in violation of state securities law and wrongly allowed the city to exceed debt limits. He’s playing chicken with the COP: At the same time his lawyers are threatening to cancel the entire debt via a lawsuit, Orr told bondholders they could get 40 percent of the the money owed them – but just the principal owed, not the interest – if they settle with the city without litigation.
As part of the deal to lessen the blow of the COPs, the city agreed on interest rate “swaps” to keep the cost down when it borrowed the $1.4 billion to pump up the underfunded pension plans. Instead, when interest rates fell, the city was suddenly on the hook for millions more and, at the time of bankruptcy, owed $286 million more on the swaps alone. A deal to cut that to $85 million is pending. The swaps were costing the city more than $48 million a year.
Some the staunchest opponents of the city’s bankruptcy filing have been the huge insurance companies which backed many of the bond issues. They have attacked some of the proposed deals, including the swaps deal, because they (not the city) will be on the hook for paying the balance.
City workers, retirees and their unions
The biggest losers are those who’ve been closest to the city for decades: its employees and retirees. In his initial repayment proposal, known as a plan of adjustment, Orr laid out sweeping cuts for city workers and retirees, following a U.S. bankruptcy judge’s ruling that pensions could be reduced even though they are otherwise protected by state law. Orr called for cuts in pensions ranging from 10 to 34 percent. He also ruled out any future cost-of-living increases.
Orr’s also tackled the estimated $5.7 billion needed to pay for retiree healthcare benefits by creating a special fund, created with $526 million over 20 years, to pay health care claims.
The so-called voluntary employee beneficiary association would allow Detroit to wash its hands of all health care liability in 20 years. It would also reduce its annual payout for retiree healthcare benefits from the current $139 million annually to $42 million and, after 10 years, to $10 million a year. Retirees would get monthly stipends to offset their private plans and would be moved into Medicare (if old enough), or into plans bought through the Affordable Care Act.
Mike Wilkinson is Bridge’s computer-assisted reporting specialist. Mike held a similar role at the Detroit News, and was also part of a team at The Blade of Toledo that in 2006 won national honors for stories detailing the "Coingate" scandal, including a finalist spot for a Pulitzer Prize.
Arts & Culture