Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- What explains Michigan's large Arab American community?
- Some think their immigrant ancestors were the last that should be allowed in the U.S.
- Michigan Republican Party's tactics remind me of Watergate, because both were unnecessary
Wed August 29, 2012
Lansing surveillance cameras an invasion of privacy, ACLU and neighborhood group claim
Residents of some Lansing neighborhoods say they worry that police surveillance cameras may be invading their privacy.
The cameras were first installed in 2008 and are in now 13 locations.
Randy Watkins is a member of a Lansing group called the Coalition Against Monitoring and Surveillance.
He says an American Civil Liberties Union report bears out the group's concerns. He also claims the cameras target mainly African American neighborhoods.
"We are taking the steps to work together to look at the privacy issues, their impact on minority neighborhoods, and see where we can work together because our overall goal is to make sure that we have a safe city," Watkins says.
Watkins says Lansing police have been very cooperative about looking into the issue.
"I don't want to give the impression there's animosity, because there's not," Watkins says.
The ACLU released a report called "Eyes in the Sky: Lansing Residential Surveillance and Its Intrusion on Privacy."
"This report, like studies from around the world, shows that video surveillance is a costly, invasive and ineffective means of deterring and fighting crime," says Michael Steinberg, ACLU of Michigan legal director.
The ACLU report warns that the cameras could be used abusively, such as voyeurism, stalking or harassment.
The ACLU also says the cameras haven't helped police solve major crimes. It plans to ask the Lansing City Council to consider removing the cameras.