Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Don't like the water shut-offs in Detroit? Now you can pay someone's overdue water bill
- Approaching construction on the highway? Experts say the "zipper merge" can help
- Proposal 1 asks Michigan voters to weigh in on a complex tax issue
- This ballot proposal is critical to Michigan's economy, but most people won't bother to vote on it
- These three female candidates could be some of the most interesting leaders in Michigan
Wed June 11, 2014
Right to Life supports only part of so-called "heartbeat package"
Legislation in the state House proposed by state Rep. Thomas Hooker, R-Byron Center, would require abortion providers to use ultrasound to detect a fetus's heartbeat – and offer the woman a chance to hear it.
That bill has the support of Right to Life of Michigan.
But the group does not support Hooker's two other bills that make it a crime to perform an abortion after a heartbeat is detected.
Ultrasound can generally detect a heartbeat at about seven weeks.
Rep. Hooker says he understands Right to Life's position, "(but) I think the discussion needs to begin to happen on the fact that this is an actual baby with a heartbeat, and we need to recognize that."
Genevieve Marnon is with Right to Life of Michigan.
"It's not that we don't support the package in principal," she says, but "because (Supreme Court decision) Roe v. Wade is still in place, we don't believe the heartbeat bill will stand constitutional muster."
Marnon says Michigan still has a law on its books that makes all abortions illegal – even though court decisions have rendered that law irrelevant.
She says that law is better than Hooker's proposal, and it would go into effect immediately if Roe v. Wade is overturned.